But $3,700 would make me feel better about the EMF's.
Sep 10, 2014 Rating
I can see Verizon cringe at this blog post... by: Steve Tower Genius
Vince, every site's value is specific to that location. It could be a good deal, and there also could potentially be plenty of room still in the deal. A 20-year lease is much better than a 25 year deal because you get up to bat sooner and can negotiated sooner. The lease needs to be structured properly. Verizon leases usually have about a dozen adjustments that need to be made to make them fair enough to sign for our customers.
Now... regarding electromagnetic "radiation". Verizon and the carriers generally do not like the R-Word. It is kind of taboo in the industry.
I am probably biased in this regards since I am pro-tower. I know that government always tells the truth to its citizens, but as far as RF emissions, these sites operate at such low levels of output that you'd have to wait about 10 years in front of a cell site to have it boil an egg. This is a non-issue as far as I'm concerned.
Please call us if you'd like us to quickly look at your lease.
Like this page? Show us some Social Love. Here's how.
Would you prefer to share this page with others by linking to it?
Click on the HTML link code below.
Copy and paste it, adding a note of your own, into your blog, a Web page, forums, a blog comment, your Facebook account, or anywhere that someone would find this page valuable.
Steve or Kevin- I have had a cell site with SBA/T-Mobile (~$1500/month & 4% annual increase) for >15 years. At&t wants to co-locate. My SBA lease gives
We live in a Rural area of Plain City, OH. Our signal is horrendous. We have tried everything, Boosters in the house, upgraded equipment, etc. We recently
Tower Genius helps landlords dominate their cell site leases.